Welcome to Administrative Request Page
Block Request Archive Deletion Request Archive Protection Request Archive General Discussion Archive

This forum exists for the purpose of requesting assistance from an administrator. Leave a message here if you:

  • Need a user/IP to be blocked due to vandalism or severe disruption.
  • Need a spam page to be speedy deleted.
  • Need a page to be protected.

All administrators should have this page in their watchlists.

Blocking Requests

When reporting users, please use Template:Block-request. The fields to be filled are {{block-request|user=|reason=|reporter=|reply=}}. It is recommended you read the template documentation first.

Deletion Requests

Move Requests

It has come to my attention that someone renamed the Nunnally vi Britannia page Adolf Hilter which seems inappropriate, could someone please put a stop to it.--Hulk10 (talk) 00:31, November 16, 2017 (UTC)

CodeGeassFan83 (talk) 12:59, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

Protection Requests

Forums: Index Edit war on "Collection of official statements" page Administrative Requests

User CodeGeassFan83 reverted my recent change to the Collection of official statements page, marking it as vandalism. I disagree and have reverted it back to my proposed edit. As stated in my comment, my edit added new information that readers may find useful, removed formatting (i.e., bolding) that was not present in original quotations, removed biased wording, and removed opinions which do not belong in a "list of official statements." If the user continues this behavior, this may lead to an edit war, so perhaps this page should be protected per the page protection policy until a neutral third party can rule on which edit is more appropriate.Dc880610 (talk) 14:00, July 28, 2019 (UTC)

It should be added to that that the edits consisted of nothing but irrelevant information such as the fake video of the "japanese ending". While it did state it to be fake, that info is completely irrelevant and thus not suited there. As such your attempts to fill pages with unsuited content are nothing more than vandalism.

It must also be pointed out that this page has never caused such problems before and all these edits are being done by a brand new account which is suspicious to say the least. It's clear the root of the problem is this new person and not a page which has existed peacefully for a year.

CodeGeassFan83 (talk) 14:05, July 28, 2019 (UTC)

I will concede that the fake video could perhaps be segretated into a separate section of its own: "False Information" or such. This could further clarify that it is not official. I stand by the remaining edits. The MyAnimeList interview is anything but irrelevant. The formatting changes such as removing bolding were accurate: the bolding was not present in the original source, as Twitter only supports plain text. The information in the "Code Geass Memories" section was expanded by copying directly from the already-sourced translation. Finally, I removed various statements of opinion or bias that supports one particular viewpoints. Per the vandalism policy: "Useful community content presents the widest range of relevant and accurate information on a topic. In the case of a wiki, if someone edits a page so it reflects only a single viewpoint, that can be considered vandalism." My changes all work towards this goal. Dc880610 (talk) 14:26, July 28, 2019 (UTC)

I do agree about the additional interview, and it has been included on the page now, in my recent edit.

CodeGeassFan83 (talk) 14:29, July 28, 2019 (UTC)

General Discussion

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.