Talk:Lelouch vi Britannia

Naming
Why was this page moved back to "Lelouch Vi Britannia"? The name that all anime articles go by is "Lelouch Lamperouge". As does wikipedia, for that matter. &mdash; Rapta (talk|contribs) 19:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Because Lelouch Vi Britannia is his real name, hurfdurf sploodgeyaay! 19:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Then put it in the article's body section. The main article page should be named under the most commonly used name, not the "real" name. In this case, the "I want to use the real name" argument is outclassed by the 10000 anime magazines and web articles out there. &mdash; Rapta (talk|contribs) 19:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * And the fact that most, if not all, anime viewers refer to Lelouch under his assumed "Lamperouge" name. Which in fact, can even be considered his real name, since his mother's last name was "Lamperouge"; why that name was assumed by Lelouch. &mdash; Rapta (talk|contribs) 20:03, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * rawr don't argue with me rawr >_> (btw, you win the argument) sploodgeyaay! 12:25, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * So far, all articles have used birth-name (when available) rather than common name as the article title. I don't care which one, but it should remain consistent. If you expect to change this one, change them all. The Myotis 01:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's what I was aiming for. &mdash; Rapta (talk|contribs) 05:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Geass
Should it be noted that during the early episodes of the first season, Lelouch's Geass only had the bird-shaped sigil without the red tint to his eyes? This is also true for the first opening. It changes (to have the red tint) when they switch to the second opening. Sword of Akasha 08:42, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

It wasn't particularly important and is only a visual cue. Anubis zero 16:17, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

Lelouch's Death
Did Lelouch not steal Charles's Code? Should he not be alive? What about C.C.'s last line during the finale?
 * Lelouch is dead! Everyone related to the show has says so. - Plau 18:35, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to see a source, personally. After some google searches, nothing to that effect is found. Edit: Narutofan says that it's official http://forums.narutofan.com/showthread.php?p=19545571, but I could not find more than that. Edit2: The guy who posted it says he heard it from somewhere else, /a/ to be specific... I can't trust that post.


 * The director stated that Lelouch was dead in a Newtype article, I believe. However, you aren't going to find any "evidence". The creators thus far have no intention of proving or contradicting anything about it. Even the Lelouch lookalike in the new Code Geass work is not going to be Lelouch, or be a clone or some sort. Ultimately, there is no "canon" truth. Considering the ending as a whole, any animated work that shows him either definitively dead or alive is not going to change the opinions of the community as a whole. I, myself, wouldn't care, based on the fact that the ending itself makes little sense to me. I don't believe peace could work like that, unless the reason is that the entire human subconscious has been mind-slaved into not allowing genocidal acts. Code Geass is basically going to go down the same as End Of Evangelion. Some will say it's deep, some will say WTF, but we'll never understand it. Mr SP 11:39, December 25, 2009 (UTC)